Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Phi-4 by Microsoft wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Phi-4's 16K.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Phi-4's 93 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 300 ms for Phi-4. Phi-4 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Phi-4 leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Phi-4?
Phi-4 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Phi-4 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Phi-4?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Phi-4?
Phi-4 is faster, generating output at 93 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.