Claude Opus 4.6 vs Sonar
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Sonar by Perplexity wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Sonar's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Sonar costs $1.0/1M input and $1.0/1M output. Sonar is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Sonar leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Sonar — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Sonar?
Sonar wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Sonar for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Sonar?
Yes, Sonar is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Sonar costs $1.0/1M input and $1.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Sonar?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Sonar comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.