Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI wins on 8 of 15 benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 1395, while both score 82.0% on MMLU-Pro.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 96.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 93.5%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 78.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 85.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 72.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 76.0% on Aider Polyglot compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 75.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 85.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 95.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 91.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 65.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 52.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 400K on Context Length compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 Codex is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 85 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 400 ms for GPT-5.1 Codex. GPT-5.1 Codex delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-5.1 Codex is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
GPT-5.1 Codex wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GPT-5.1 Codex for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 78.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GPT-5.1 Codex?
Yes, GPT-5.1 Codex is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
GPT-5.1 Codex is faster, generating output at 85 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.