Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 2 of 4 benchmarks against GLM-5 by Zhipu AI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GLM-5's 1456.
Context: In context, both score 200K on Context Length.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to GLM-5's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 1030 ms for GLM-5. Claude Opus 4.6 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 leads across the board in general intelligence, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GLM-5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GLM-5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?
Claude Opus 4.6 is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.