Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 4B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 1 of 1 benchmarks against Gemma 3 4B by Google, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 4B's 96K.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemma 3 4B are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 4B — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 4B?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (1 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Gemma 3 4B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Gemma 3 4B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 3 4B?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 3 4B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 1 benchmarks including Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.