Claude Opus 4.6 vs ERNIE 4.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 1 of 1 benchmarks against ERNIE 4.5 by Baidu, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128K.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 and ERNIE 4.5 are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs ERNIE 4.5 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or ERNIE 4.5?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (1 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to ERNIE 4.5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than ERNIE 4.5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or ERNIE 4.5?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs ERNIE 4.5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 1 benchmarks including Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.