Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 1220, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 65.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 78.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 30.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 35.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 70.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 40.0%, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input tokens and $5.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 generates output at 180 tok/s compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 120 ms for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528. Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 0528 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to DeepSeek R1 0528 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than DeepSeek R1 0528?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input and $5.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek R1 0528?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is faster, generating output at 180 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 0528 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.