Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Llama 4 Scout by Meta wins on 8 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, both score 1240 on Chatbot Arena ELO, while Llama 4 Scout scores 74.3% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude 3 Opus scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Scout's 75.0%, while Llama 4 Scout scores 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while both score 32.0% on LiveCodeBench.
Math: In math, both score 68.0% on MATH, while Claude 3 Opus scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Scout's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Scout's 38.0%, while Llama 4 Scout scores 16.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Scout scores 1.3M on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Scout's 140 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 330 ms for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Llama 4 Scout leads across the board in coding, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Llama 4 Scout for coding?
Llama 4 Scout is better for coding, scoring 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Yes, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is faster, generating output at 140 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.