Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.0 Flash by Google wins on 9 of 20 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 8. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, both score 1240 on Chatbot Arena ELO, while Claude 3 Opus scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 66.0%, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 8.9 on MT-Bench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.8, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 86.6% on IFEval compared to Claude 3 Opus's 82.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 29.0% on SimpleQA compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 27.5%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 81.0% on TruthfulQA compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 80.5%.
Coding: In coding, Claude 3 Opus scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 76.0%, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while both score 32.0% on LiveCodeBench.
Math: In math, both score 68.0% on MATH, while Claude 3 Opus scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3 Opus scores 59.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 38.0%, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 86.8% on BBH compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 84.2%, while Claude 3 Opus scores 90.5% on Winogrande compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 89.5%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Claude 3 Opus's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 220 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 85 ms for Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads across the board in coding, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.0 Flash wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 8). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is better for coding, scoring 28.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster, generating output at 220 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 20 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, IFEval, SimpleQA, MATH, TruthfulQA, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.