Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 13 of 15 benchmarks against Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3 Opus's 1240, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3 Opus's 82.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3 Opus's 78.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3 Opus's 22.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3 Opus's 32.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3 Opus's 68.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3 Opus's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3 Opus's 59.4%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3 Opus's 8.0%.
Context: In context, Claude 3 Opus scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $75.0/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3 Opus generates output at 25 tok/s compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for Claude 3 Opus versus 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528. DeepSeek R1 0528 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 0528 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek R1 0528?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3 Opus compare to DeepSeek R1 0528 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than DeepSeek R1 0528?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.0/1M input and $75.0/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek R1 0528?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is faster, generating output at 40 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 0528 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.