Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic wins on 8 of 16 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 1340, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 79.0%, while o1 scores 92.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 62.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to o1's 48.9%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.0%.
Math: In math, Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 96.2% on MATH compared to o1's 94.8%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 95.0%, while o1 scores 74.0% on AIME 2025 compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.7%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 84.8% on GPQA Diamond compared to o1's 77.3%, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 38.0% on ARC-AGI compared to o1's 32.0%.
Context: In context, both score 200K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet generates output at 70 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Claude 3.7 Sonnet versus 1000 ms for o1. Claude 3.7 Sonnet delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and math and affordability and speed, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge. For those who value general intelligence, o1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or o1?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to o1 for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is better for coding, scoring 62.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 48.9%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet cheaper than o1?
Yes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is cheaper. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or o1?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.