Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 by OpenAI wins on 15 of 16 benchmarks against Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 scores 1464 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 1340, while GPT-5.1 scores 86.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 79.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 91.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 62.3%, while GPT-5.1 scores 82.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.0%.
Math: In math, Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 96.2% on MATH compared to GPT-5.1's 95.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 95.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 94.0% on AIME 2025 compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.7%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 scores 88.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 84.8%, while GPT-5.1 scores 50.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 38.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.1 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1's 95 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Claude 3.7 Sonnet versus 350 ms for GPT-5.1. GPT-5.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing math, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and affordability and speed, GPT-5.1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (15 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to GPT-5.1 for coding?
GPT-5.1 is better for coding, scoring 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 62.3%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet cheaper than GPT-5.1?
Yes, GPT-5.1 is cheaper. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 is faster, generating output at 95 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.