Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.6
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 1180, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 74.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 22.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 28.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 62.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 84.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 91.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 35.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 12.0%.
Context: In context, both score 200K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input tokens and $4.0/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku generates output at 170 tok/s compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 68 tok/s, and the time to first token is 100 ms for Claude 3.5 Haiku versus 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6. Claude 3.5 Haiku delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.6 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Claude Opus 4.6 for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6?
Yes, Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/1M input and $4.0/1M output tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster, generating output at 170 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.6 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.