o3 vs Qwen 3 32B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o3 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Qwen 3 32B by Qwen, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o3 scores 1380 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 32B's 1250, while o3 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 32B's 67.0%.
Coding: In coding, o3 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 3 32B's 79.0%, while o3 scores 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 32B's 30.0%, while o3 scores 70.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 32B's 36.0%.
Math: In math, o3 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 32B's 72.0%, while o3 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 32B's 89.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 32B's 42.0%, while o3 scores 75.7% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 3 32B's 20.0%.
Context: In context, o3 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 32B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
o3 costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $8.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output. Qwen 3 32B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
o3 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 32B's 120 tok/s, and the time to first token is 800 ms for o3 versus 200 ms for Qwen 3 32B. Qwen 3 32B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, o3 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 32B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
o3 vs Qwen 3 32B — FAQ
Which is better, o3 or Qwen 3 32B?
o3 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o3 compare to Qwen 3 32B for coding?
o3 is better for coding, scoring 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is o3 cheaper than Qwen 3 32B?
Yes, Qwen 3 32B is cheaper. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o3 or Qwen 3 32B?
Qwen 3 32B is faster, generating output at 120 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the o3 vs Qwen 3 32B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.