o3 vs Qwen3 14B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o3 by OpenAI and Qwen3 14B by Alibaba are evenly matched across 4 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen3 14B's 59.4%.
Context: In context, o3 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Qwen3 14B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
o3 costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $8.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen3 14B costs $0.12/1M input and $0.24/1M output. Qwen3 14B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Qwen3 14B leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
o3 vs Qwen3 14B — FAQ
Which is better, o3 or Qwen3 14B?
o3 and Qwen3 14B are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does o3 compare to Qwen3 14B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is o3 cheaper than Qwen3 14B?
Yes, Qwen3 14B is cheaper. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens. Qwen3 14B costs $0.12/1M input and $0.24/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o3 or Qwen3 14B?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the o3 vs Qwen3 14B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.