o1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Step 3.7 Flash by StepFun wins on 4 of 6 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 39.7 on AA Coding Index compared to Step 3.7 Flash's 39.6.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Step 3.7 Flash's 76.6%.
Context: In context, Step 3.7 Flash scores 262K on Context Length compared to o1's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
o1 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $60.0/1M output tokens, while Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20/1M input and $1.1/1M output. Step 3.7 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Step 3.7 Flash leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
o1 vs Step 3.7 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o1 compare to Step 3.7 Flash for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is o1 cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash?
Yes, Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens. Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20/1M input and $1.1/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o1 or Step 3.7 Flash?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the o1 vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 6 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, AA Coding Index, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.