o1 vs Qwen 3 Coder
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 Coder by Qwen wins on 8 of 15 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 1290, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 72.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 Coder scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to o1's 89.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to o1's 48.9%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 52.0%.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 76.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 48.0%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 28.0%.
Context: In context, Qwen 3 Coder scores 262K on Context Length compared to o1's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
o1 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $60.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.30/1M input and $1.0/1M output. Qwen 3 Coder is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
o1 generates output at 35 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1000 ms for o1 versus 350 ms for Qwen 3 Coder. Qwen 3 Coder delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing general intelligence and math, o1 has the edge. For those who value coding and affordability and speed, Qwen 3 Coder is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
o1 vs Qwen 3 Coder — FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o1 compare to Qwen 3 Coder for coding?
Qwen 3 Coder is better for coding, scoring 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 48.9%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is o1 cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder?
Yes, Qwen 3 Coder is cheaper. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.30/1M input and $1.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o1 or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the o1 vs Qwen 3 Coder comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.