o1 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba wins on 5 of 5 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, Qwen3.7 Max scores 66 on AA Coding Index compared to o1's 39.7.
Context: In context, Qwen3.7 Max scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to o1's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
o1 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $60.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.5/1M input and $4.4/1M output. Qwen3.7 Max is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Qwen3.7 Max leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
o1 vs Qwen3.7 Max — FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max wins on more benchmarks overall (5 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o1 compare to Qwen3.7 Max for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is o1 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?
Yes, Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.5/1M input and $4.4/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o1 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the o1 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison cover?
This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, AA Coding Index, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.