o1 vs Qwen 3 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Qwen 3 235B by Qwen, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 235B's 1320, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 235B's 77.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 3 235B's 84.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 235B's 42.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 235B's 46.0%.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 235B's 82.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 235B's 93.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 235B's 55.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to o1's 32.0%.
Context: In context, o1 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 235B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
o1 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $60.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output. Qwen 3 235B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
o1 generates output at 35 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 235B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1000 ms for o1 versus 450 ms for Qwen 3 235B. Qwen 3 235B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, o1 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 235B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
o1 vs Qwen 3 235B — FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Qwen 3 235B?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o1 compare to Qwen 3 235B for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 42.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is o1 cheaper than Qwen 3 235B?
Yes, Qwen 3 235B is cheaper. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o1 or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the o1 vs Qwen 3 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.