o1 vs Pixtral Large
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Pixtral Large by Mistral, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Pixtral Large's 1270, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Pixtral Large's 70.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Pixtral Large's 80.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Pixtral Large's 35.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Pixtral Large's 40.0%.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Pixtral Large's 74.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Pixtral Large's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Pixtral Large's 48.0%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Pixtral Large's 22.0%.
Context: In context, o1 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Pixtral Large's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
o1 costs $15.0/1M input tokens and $60.0/1M output tokens, while Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output. Pixtral Large is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
o1 generates output at 35 tok/s compared to Pixtral Large's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1000 ms for o1 versus 400 ms for Pixtral Large. Pixtral Large delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, o1 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
o1 vs Pixtral Large — FAQ
Which is better, o1 or Pixtral Large?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does o1 compare to Pixtral Large for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 35.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is o1 cheaper than Pixtral Large?
Yes, Pixtral Large is cheaper. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens. Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, o1 or Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the o1 vs Pixtral Large comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.