nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b by NVIDIA wins on 4 of 5 benchmarks against o3 by OpenAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b's 61.6%.
Context: In context, nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b scores 262K on Context Length compared to o3's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.20/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b or o3?
nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b compare to o3 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b cheaper than o3?
Yes, nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b is cheaper. nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b costs $0.05/1M input and $0.20/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b or o3?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.