Mistral Medium 3.1 vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 11 of 16 benchmarks against Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 1250, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 66.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 77.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 28.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 34.0%, while o1 scores 39.7 on AA Coding Index compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 20.5.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 68.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 40.0%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 18.0%.
Context: In context, o1 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input tokens and $2.0/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 generates output at 110 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 200 ms for Mistral Medium 3.1 versus 1000 ms for o1. Mistral Medium 3.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, o1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or o1?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Mistral Medium 3.1 compare to o1 for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 cheaper than o1?
Yes, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Mistral Medium 3.1 or o1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is faster, generating output at 110 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.