Mistral Large 25.12 vs Qwen 3 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 235B by Qwen wins on 8 of 14 benchmarks against Mistral Large 25.12 by Mistral, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 1418 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 235B's 1320, while Qwen 3 235B scores 77.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 73.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 235B scores 84.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 82.0%, while both score 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified, while Qwen 3 235B scores 46.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 44.0%.
Math: In math, Qwen 3 235B scores 82.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 78.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 93.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 91.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Qwen 3 235B scores 55.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 52.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 28.0%.
Context: In context, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 262K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 235B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input tokens and $1.5/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output. Qwen 3 235B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Mistral Large 25.12 generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 235B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 380 ms for Mistral Large 25.12 versus 450 ms for Qwen 3 235B. Mistral Large 25.12 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing general intelligence and speed, Mistral Large 25.12 has the edge. For those who value math and affordability, Qwen 3 235B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Mistral Large 25.12 vs Qwen 3 235B — FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large 25.12 or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Mistral Large 25.12 compare to Qwen 3 235B for coding?
Both models score 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified, making them equally capable for coding tasks.
Is Mistral Large 25.12 cheaper than Qwen 3 235B?
Yes, Qwen 3 235B is cheaper. Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Mistral Large 25.12 or Qwen 3 235B?
Mistral Large 25.12 is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Mistral Large 25.12 vs Qwen 3 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.