Mistral Large 25.12 vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mistral Large 25.12 by Mistral wins on 11 of 17 benchmarks against Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 1418 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 1250, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 73.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 66.0%.
Coding: In coding, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 82.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 77.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 28.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 44.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 34.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 20.5 on AA Coding Index compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 20.1.
Math: In math, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 78.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 68.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 91.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 52.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 40.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 18.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 3.1 on AA Agentic Index compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 2.4.
Context: In context, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 262K on Context Length compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input tokens and $1.5/1M output tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Mistral Large 25.12 generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 110 tok/s, and the time to first token is 380 ms for Mistral Large 25.12 versus 200 ms for Mistral Medium 3.1. Mistral Medium 3.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Mistral Large 25.12 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Mistral Large 25.12 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large 25.12 or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Large 25.12 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Mistral Large 25.12 compare to Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?
Mistral Large 25.12 is better for coding, scoring 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Mistral Large 25.12 cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Yes, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Mistral Large 25.12 or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is faster, generating output at 110 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Mistral Large 25.12 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.