Mercury 2 vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mercury 2 by Inception and o3 by OpenAI are evenly matched across 6 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, o3 scores 1074 on Design Arena ELO compared to Mercury 2's 1014, while o3 scores 1048 on Website Arena ELO compared to Mercury 2's 1036.
Context: In context, o3 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mercury 2's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input tokens and $0.75/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. Mercury 2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Mercury 2 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Mercury 2 vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, Mercury 2 or o3?
Mercury 2 and o3 are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does Mercury 2 compare to o3 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Mercury 2 cheaper than o3?
Yes, Mercury 2 is cheaper. Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.75/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Mercury 2 or o3?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Mercury 2 vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 6 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost, Design Arena ELO, Website Arena ELO. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.