Mercury 2 vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mercury 2 by Inception wins on 3 of 5 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 39.7 on AA Coding Index compared to Mercury 2's 31.1.
Context: In context, o1 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mercury 2's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input tokens and $0.75/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Mercury 2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Mercury 2 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Mercury 2 vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Mercury 2 or o1?
Mercury 2 wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Mercury 2 compare to o1 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Mercury 2 cheaper than o1?
Yes, Mercury 2 is cheaper. Mercury 2 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.75/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Mercury 2 or o1?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Mercury 2 vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, AA Coding Index, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.