Llama 3.3 70B vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o3 by OpenAI wins on 16 of 20 benchmarks against Llama 3.3 70B by Meta, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o3 scores 1380 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 1210, while o3 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while o3 scores 9.5 on MT-Bench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 8.6, while o3 scores 49.4% on SimpleQA compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 21.0%, while o3 scores 86.0% on TruthfulQA compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 73.5%.
Coding: In coding, o3 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 72.0%, while o3 scores 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 22.0%, while o3 scores 70.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 26.0%.
Math: In math, o3 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while o3 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 34.0%, while o3 scores 75.7% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 10.0%, while o3 scores 95.8% on BBH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 81.5%, while o3 scores 94.0% on Winogrande compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 85.5%.
Context: In context, o3 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 131K.
Multimodal: In multimodal, o3 scores 86.8% on MathVista compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 58.2%.
Pricing Comparison
Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input tokens and $0.32/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Llama 3.3 70B generates output at 90 tok/s compared to o3's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 300 ms for Llama 3.3 70B versus 800 ms for o3. Llama 3.3 70B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Llama 3.3 70B has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, o3 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Llama 3.3 70B vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.3 70B or o3?
o3 wins on more benchmarks overall (16 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Llama 3.3 70B compare to o3 for coding?
o3 is better for coding, scoring 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Llama 3.3 70B cheaper than o3?
Yes, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Llama 3.3 70B or o3?
Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Llama 3.3 70B vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 20 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, SimpleQA, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.