Inkling vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Inkling by NVIDIA wins on 6 of 7 benchmarks against o3 by OpenAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, Inkling scores 1183 on Design Arena ELO compared to o3's 1074, while Inkling scores 1227 on Website Arena ELO compared to o3's 1048.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Inkling's 83.2%.
Context: In context, Inkling scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to o3's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Inkling costs $1.0/1M input tokens and $4.0/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. Inkling is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Inkling leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Inkling vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, Inkling or o3?
Inkling wins on more benchmarks overall (6 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Inkling compare to o3 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Inkling cheaper than o3?
Yes, Inkling is cheaper. Inkling costs $1.0/1M input and $4.0/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Inkling or o3?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Inkling vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 7 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost, Design Arena ELO, Website Arena ELO. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.