GPT-5.1 Codex vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B by Alibaba wins on 4 of 5 benchmarks against GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Reasoning: In reasoning, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores 80.5% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 65.0%.

Context: In context, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 400K on Context Length compared to Qwen3.6 35B-A3B's 262K.

Pricing Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.6 35B-A3B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.90/1M output. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the more affordable option for API usage.

Verdict

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B — FAQ

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Codex or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does GPT-5.1 Codex compare to Qwen3.6 35B-A3B for coding?

SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.

Is GPT-5.1 Codex cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Yes, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper. GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.90/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-5.1 Codex or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.

What benchmarks does the GPT-5.1 Codex vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B comparison cover?

This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.