GPT-5.1 Codex vs Grok 4.3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Grok 4.3 by xAI wins on 3 of 6 benchmarks against GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 1197 on Design Arena ELO compared to Grok 4.3's 1178, while Grok 4.3 scores 1206 on Website Arena ELO compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 1174.
Context: In context, Grok 4.3 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 400K.
Pricing Comparison
GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Grok 4.3 costs $1.3/1M input and $2.5/1M output. Both models are priced identically for input tokens.
Verdict
GPT-5.1 Codex and Grok 4.3 are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
GPT-5.1 Codex vs Grok 4.3 — FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.1 Codex or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does GPT-5.1 Codex compare to Grok 4.3 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is GPT-5.1 Codex cheaper than Grok 4.3?
Both models are priced the same at $1.3/1M input tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex output costs $10.0/1M and Grok 4.3 output costs $2.5/1M.
Which is faster, GPT-5.1 Codex or Grok 4.3?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the GPT-5.1 Codex vs Grok 4.3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 6 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost, Design Arena ELO, Website Arena ELO. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.