GLM-4.6 vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GLM-4.6 by Zhipu AI wins on 6 of 7 benchmarks against o3 by OpenAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, GLM-4.6 scores 1167 on Design Arena ELO compared to o3's 1074, while GLM-4.6 scores 1186 on Website Arena ELO compared to o3's 1048.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to GLM-4.6's 78.6%.
Context: In context, GLM-4.6 scores 205K on Context Length compared to o3's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
GLM-4.6 costs $0.43/1M input tokens and $1.8/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. GLM-4.6 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
GLM-4.6 leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
GLM-4.6 vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, GLM-4.6 or o3?
GLM-4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (6 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does GLM-4.6 compare to o3 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is GLM-4.6 cheaper than o3?
Yes, GLM-4.6 is cheaper. GLM-4.6 costs $0.43/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, GLM-4.6 or o3?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the GLM-4.6 vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 7 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Cached Input Cost, Design Arena ELO, Website Arena ELO. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.