Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3 Pro by Google wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Llama 3.3 70B by Meta, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3 Pro scores 1492 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 1210, while Gemini 3 Pro scores 89.8% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3 Pro scores 91.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 72.0%, while Gemini 3 Pro scores 65.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 22.0%, while Gemini 3 Pro scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 26.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 3 Pro scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while Gemini 3 Pro scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro scores 91.9% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 34.0%, while Gemini 3 Pro scores 54.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 10.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro generates output at 60 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 450 ms for Gemini 3 Pro versus 300 ms for Llama 3.3 70B. Llama 3.3 70B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 3 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 3.3 70B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B?
Gemini 3 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to Llama 3.3 70B for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro is better for coding, scoring 65.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 3 Pro cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper. Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.32/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.