Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 7 of 11 benchmarks against Qwen3.5 397B-A17B by Alibaba, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 30.4 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 19.1.

Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 68.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 48.2, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1256 on Design Arena ELO compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 1183, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1246 on Website Arena ELO compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 1203.

Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 85.9%, while Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores 10.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 10.3, while Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores 78.5% on τ²-Bench Airline compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 75.3%.

Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's 262K.

Pricing Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.5 397B-A17B costs $0.55/1M input and $3.5/1M output. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the more affordable option for API usage.

Verdict

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B — FAQ

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (7 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Qwen3.5 397B-A17B for coding?

SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Yes, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is cheaper. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B costs $0.55/1M input and $3.5/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.

What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B comparison cover?

This comparison covers 11 benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, AA Intelligence Index, AA Coding Index, AA Agentic Index, Cached Input Cost, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.