Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 32B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 13 of 17 benchmarks against Qwen 3 32B by Qwen, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 32B's 1250, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 32B's 67.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16.7 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 7.2.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 3 32B's 79.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 32B's 30.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 32B's 36.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 33.3 on AA Coding Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 15.3.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 32B's 72.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 32B's 89.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 32B's 42.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 3 32B's 20.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 3.5 on AA Agentic Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 0.9.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 32B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output. Qwen 3 32B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 32B's 120 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 200 ms for Qwen 3 32B. Qwen 3 32B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 32B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 32B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 32B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to Qwen 3 32B for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Qwen 3 32B?
Yes, Qwen 3 32B is cheaper. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 32B?
Qwen 3 32B is faster, generating output at 120 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 32B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.