Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Qwen 3 235B by Qwen, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 235B's 1320, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 235B's 77.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 3 235B's 84.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 235B's 42.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 235B's 46.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 235B's 82.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 235B's 93.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 235B's 55.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 3 235B's 35.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 235B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output. Qwen 3 235B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 235B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 450 ms for Qwen 3 235B. Qwen 3 235B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 235B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 235B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to Qwen 3 235B for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 42.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Qwen 3 235B?
Yes, Qwen 3 235B is cheaper. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.