Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 17 of 22 benchmarks against GPT-4o by OpenAI, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4o's 1280, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4o's 72.6%, while both score 9.3 on MT-Bench, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to GPT-4o's 85.3%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.8% on TruthfulQA compared to GPT-4o's 83.5%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-4o's 87.2%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4o's 30.7%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4o's 38.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to GPT-4o's 74.6%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to GPT-4o's 92.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4o's 53.6%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4o's 5.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 94.5% on BBH compared to GPT-4o's 87.3%, while GPT-4o scores 92.5% on Winogrande compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 92.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GPT-4o's 128K, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.8% on RULER compared to GPT-4o's 91.6%.
Multimodal: In multimodal, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 80.4% on MathVista compared to GPT-4o's 63.8%.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-4o costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro generates output at 55 tok/s compared to GPT-4o's 143 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 450 ms for GPT-4o. GPT-4o delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge. For those who value speed, GPT-4o is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (17 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to GPT-4o for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.7%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than GPT-4o?
Yes, Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. GPT-4o costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is faster, generating output at 143 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o comparison cover?
This comparison covers 22 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, IFEval, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.