Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google and Gemma 3 27B by Google are evenly matched across 10 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemma 3 27B's 1339, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16.7 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Gemma 3 27B's 4.9.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 33.3 on AA Coding Index compared to Gemma 3 27B's 10.1.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 3.5 on AA Agentic Index compared to Gemma 3 27B's 0.1.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.45/1M output. Gemma 3 27B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Gemma 3 27B's 58 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 390 ms for Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemma 3 27B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemma 3 27B are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to Gemma 3 27B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?
Yes, Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.45/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemma 3 27B?
Gemma 3 27B is faster, generating output at 58 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 10 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, AA Intelligence Index, AA Coding Index, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.