DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.1 Codex
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI wins on 12 of 15 benchmarks against DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 1395 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 1340, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 78.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 96.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 84.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 78.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 46.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 85.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 48.0%.
Math: In math, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 85.0% on MATH compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 82.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 95.0% on GSM8K compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 92.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 65.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 55.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex scores 52.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 35.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.1 Codex scores 400K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 164K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input tokens and $0.95/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. DeepSeek V3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 generates output at 65 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1 Codex's 85 tok/s, and the time to first token is 450 ms for DeepSeek V3.1 versus 400 ms for GPT-5.1 Codex. GPT-5.1 Codex delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability, DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and speed, GPT-5.1 Codex is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.1 Codex — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
GPT-5.1 Codex wins on more benchmarks overall (12 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek V3.1 compare to GPT-5.1 Codex for coding?
GPT-5.1 Codex is better for coding, scoring 78.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 46.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 cheaper than GPT-5.1 Codex?
Yes, DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.25/1M input and $0.95/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V3.1 or GPT-5.1 Codex?
GPT-5.1 Codex is faster, generating output at 85 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.1 Codex comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.