DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 Coder by Qwen wins on 7 of 14 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 1290, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 72.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 Coder scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 55.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 52.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 76.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 48.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, both score 131K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.20/1M input and $0.80/1M output. Qwen 3 Coder is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 350 ms for Qwen 3 Coder. Qwen 3 Coder delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value coding and affordability and speed, Qwen 3 Coder is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder wins on more benchmarks overall (7 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Qwen 3 Coder for coding?
Qwen 3 Coder is better for coding, scoring 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 55.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder?
Yes, Qwen 3 Coder is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.20/1M input and $0.80/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.