DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o3 Pro by OpenAI wins on 11 of 15 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o3 Pro scores 1410 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 1375, while o3 Pro scores 86.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 84.0%.
Coding: In coding, o3 Pro scores 92.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%, while o3 Pro scores 70.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 55.0%, while o3 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 58.0%.
Math: In math, o3 Pro scores 97.0% on MATH compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 96.0%, while o3 Pro scores 99.0% on GSM8K compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 97.5%, while o3 Pro scores 98.4% on AIME 2025 compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 87.5%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 Pro scores 85.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 81.0%, while o3 Pro scores 70.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, o3 Pro scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while o3 Pro costs $20.0/1M input and $80.0/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to o3 Pro's 25 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1200 ms for o3 Pro. DeepSeek R1 0528 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, o3 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o3 Pro?
o3 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to o3 Pro for coding?
o3 Pro is better for coding, scoring 70.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 55.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than o3 Pro?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. o3 Pro costs $20.0/1M input and $80.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o3 Pro?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is faster, generating output at 40 tok/s compared to 25 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.