DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Mistral Small 3.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 1190, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 58.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 70.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 20.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 24.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 58.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 80.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 30.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 10.0%.
Context: In context, both score 131K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Mistral Small 3.2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 160 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 120 ms for Mistral Small 3.2. Mistral Small 3.2 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Mistral Small 3.2 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Mistral Small 3.2?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Mistral Small 3.2 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2?
Yes, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is faster, generating output at 160 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Mistral Small 3.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.