DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ministral 3 8B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Ministral 3 8B by Mistral wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Ministral 3 8B scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Ministral 3 8B's 172 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 280 ms for Ministral 3 8B. Ministral 3 8B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Ministral 3 8B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ministral 3 8B — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Ministral 3 8B?
Ministral 3 8B wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Ministral 3 8B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Ministral 3 8B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Ministral 3 8B?
Ministral 3 8B is faster, generating output at 172 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ministral 3 8B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.