Command R vs Mistral Large 25.12
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Mistral Large 25.12 by Mistral wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Command R by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 1418 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command R's 1130, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 73.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command R's 52.0%.
Coding: In coding, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 82.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command R's 62.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command R's 12.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 44.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command R's 18.0%.
Math: In math, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 78.0% on MATH compared to Command R's 45.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 91.0% on GSM8K compared to Command R's 72.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 52.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command R's 25.0%, while Mistral Large 25.12 scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command R's 5.0%.
Context: In context, Mistral Large 25.12 scores 262K on Context Length compared to Command R's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Command R costs $0.15/1M input tokens and $0.60/1M output tokens, while Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output. Command R is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command R generates output at 90 tok/s compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 300 ms for Command R versus 380 ms for Mistral Large 25.12. Command R delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Command R has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Mistral Large 25.12 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command R vs Mistral Large 25.12 — FAQ
Which is better, Command R or Mistral Large 25.12?
Mistral Large 25.12 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command R compare to Mistral Large 25.12 for coding?
Mistral Large 25.12 is better for coding, scoring 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 12.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command R cheaper than Mistral Large 25.12?
Yes, Command R is cheaper. Command R costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens. Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command R or Mistral Large 25.12?
Command R is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command R vs Mistral Large 25.12 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.