Command R vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 11 of 15 benchmarks against Command R by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command R's 1130, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command R's 52.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 9.3 on MT-Bench compared to Command R's 7.5.

Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command R's 62.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command R's 12.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command R's 18.0%.

Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Command R's 45.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Command R's 72.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command R's 25.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command R's 5.0%.

Context: In context, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command R's 128K.

Pricing Comparison

Command R costs $0.15/1M input tokens and $0.60/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Command R is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

Command R generates output at 90 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 300 ms for Command R versus 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Command R delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Command R has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

Command R vs Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ

Which is better, Command R or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Command R compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 12.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is Command R cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Yes, Command R is cheaper. Command R costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Command R or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Command R is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Command R vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison cover?

This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.