Command A vs Qwen 3 Coder
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 Coder by Qwen wins on 14 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Qwen 3 Coder scores 1290 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 72.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 Coder scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 52.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, Qwen 3 Coder scores 76.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 90.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Qwen 3 Coder scores 48.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Qwen 3 Coder scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Qwen 3 Coder scores 262K on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.30/1M input and $1.0/1M output. Qwen 3 Coder is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 350 ms for Qwen 3 Coder. Qwen 3 Coder delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 Coder leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Qwen 3 Coder — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Qwen 3 Coder for coding?
Qwen 3 Coder is better for coding, scoring 66.5% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder?
Yes, Qwen 3 Coder is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.30/1M input and $1.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Qwen 3 Coder comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.