Command A vs Qwen 3 32B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 32B by Qwen wins on 8 of 17 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, both score 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 32B's 67.0%, while Command A scores 13.9 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 7.2.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 32B scores 79.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 32B's 30.0%, while Qwen 3 32B scores 36.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 15.3.
Math: In math, both score 72.0% on MATH, while Qwen 3 32B scores 89.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 32B's 42.0%, while Qwen 3 32B scores 20.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Qwen 3 32B's 0.9.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 32B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output. Qwen 3 32B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 32B's 120 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 200 ms for Qwen 3 32B. Qwen 3 32B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 32B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Qwen 3 32B — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Qwen 3 32B?
Qwen 3 32B wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Qwen 3 32B for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Qwen 3 32B?
Yes, Qwen 3 32B is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 32B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Qwen 3 32B?
Qwen 3 32B is faster, generating output at 120 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Qwen 3 32B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.