Command A vs Qwen 3 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 235B by Qwen wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Qwen 3 235B scores 1320 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while Qwen 3 235B scores 77.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, Qwen 3 235B scores 84.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 46.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, Qwen 3 235B scores 82.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 93.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Qwen 3 235B scores 55.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while Qwen 3 235B scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 235B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output. Qwen 3 235B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 235B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 450 ms for Qwen 3 235B. Command A delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Command A has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, Qwen 3 235B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Qwen 3 235B — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Qwen 3 235B for coding?
Qwen 3 235B is better for coding, scoring 42.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Qwen 3 235B?
Yes, Qwen 3 235B is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 235B costs $0.46/1M input and $1.8/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Qwen 3 235B?
Command A is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Qwen 3 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.