Command A vs o3
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o3 by OpenAI wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o3 scores 1380 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while o3 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, o3 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while o3 scores 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while o3 scores 70.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, o3 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while o3 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o3 scores 83.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while o3 scores 75.7% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to o3's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output. o3 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to o3's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 800 ms for o3. Command A delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Command A has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, o3 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs o3 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or o3?
o3 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to o3 for coding?
o3 is better for coding, scoring 69.1% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than o3?
Yes, o3 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. o3 costs $2.0/1M input and $8.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or o3?
Command A is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs o3 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.