Command A vs Mistral Small 3.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 1190, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 58.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 70.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 20.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 24.0%.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 58.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 80.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 30.0%, while Command A scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 10.0%.
Context: In context, both score 256K on Context Length.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.07/1M input and $0.20/1M output. Mistral Small 3.2 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Mistral Small 3.2's 160 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 120 ms for Mistral Small 3.2. Mistral Small 3.2 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Mistral Small 3.2 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Mistral Small 3.2?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Mistral Small 3.2 for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2?
Yes, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.07/1M input and $0.20/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is faster, generating output at 160 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Mistral Small 3.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.