Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 10 of 16 benchmarks against Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, both score 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 66.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 77.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 28.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 34.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 20.5.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 68.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 40.0%, while Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 3.1.
Context: In context, Command A scores 256K on Context Length compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 110 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 200 ms for Mistral Medium 3.1. Mistral Medium 3.1 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.1 — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Yes, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is faster, generating output at 110 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.